Families' Heartache Regarding Coastal Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.