🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where African descendants are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.